Legal Study of the Power of Proof in Civil Law (Study of Decision Number: 332/Pdt.G/2024/PN Tnn)

  • Reynold Simandjuntak UNIMA Campus in Tondano
  • Sherina Darius Universitas Negeri Manado
  • Sarli S. Landota UNIMA Campus in Tondano
  • Gratia P. Lombogia UNIMA Campus in Tondano
Keywords: Legal Studies, Evidentiary Power, civil law

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the validity of the sale and purchase acquisition in evidence in decision number 332/Pdt.G/2024/PN Tnn. The method used in this research is Normative Juridical. The results of this study are that the Panel of Judges to decide the case, the Panel of Judges looks at the facts of the trial from the proof of letters, witness evidence and even other legal facts presented at the trial. Especially in deciding this case with number 332/Pdt.G/2024/PN Tnn, the panel of judges considered that the Plaintiff, who was actually burdened with proof, could not prove the truth about the arguments and claims he presented at the trial. Meanwhile, the Defendant was able to prove so accurately in denying every argument postulated by the plaintiff against the plaintiff through presenting accurate letter evidence and also witness testimony showing that the true ownership of the land that was the object of the dispute belonged to the Defendant. So the judge's consideration in looking at the flow of the trial to decide this case focuses on every evidence and fact of the trial presented by the Defendant. As well as in the burden of proof in Article 163 HIR, the plaintiff has the obligation to prove the facts they submit, while the defendant is obliged to prove the rebuttal submitted. The plaintiff is not required to prove the truth of the defendant's rebuttal, and vice versa, there is no need to prove the truth of the rebuttal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achmad Ali dan Wiwie Heryani, Asas-asas Hukum Pembuktian Perdata, Kencana, Cetakan ke-2, Jakarta, 2013, hal 134
Achmad Ali, Asas-Asas Hukum Pembuktian Perdata, Jakarta: Kencana, 2012.hal. 81
Makarao, Mohammad Taufik, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Acara Perdata, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2009. hal.8
Marfono, Asas Keadilan, Kemanfaatan & Kepastian Hukum dalam Putusan Hakim, Jakarta Timur: Sinar Grafika, 2019. hal.27
Munir Fuady, Teori Hukum Pembuktian ( Pidana dan Perdata ), P.T. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2006, hal. 9.
R. Subekti dan R. Tjitrosudibio, Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata, Pradnya Paramita, Cetakan ke-32, Jakarta, 2002, hal. 457
Rahardjo, Satjipto, Pendidikan Hukum sebagai Pendidikan Manusia. Yogyakarta:Genta Publishing, 2009. hal.180
Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2001, hal. 24
SudiknoMertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1993. hal.71
SudknoMertokusumo, Penemuan Hukum sebuah Pengantar, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2009. hal.93
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (Pasal 28D ayat (1)
Zainuddin Ali, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2014, hal. 12
Published
2025-07-01
How to Cite
Simandjuntak, R., Darius, S., S. Landota , S., & P. Lombogia , G. (2025). Legal Study of the Power of Proof in Civil Law (Study of Decision Number: 332/Pdt.G/2024/PN Tnn). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Tambun Bungai, 10(1), 613-625. https://doi.org/10.61394/jihtb.v10i1.509
Section
Articles